PROSPERITY CO. v. AMERICAN MACHINE & METALS

No. 83.

47 F.Supp. 289 (1942)

PROSPERITY CO., Inc., v. AMERICAN MACHINE & METALS, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware.

July 24, 1942.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Bohleber, of New York City, and Howard Duane, of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Willis B. Rice, of New York City, and Francis A. Reardon, of Wilmington, Del., for defendant.


KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

Claim 9 of the patent was held valid but not infringed. This is the plaintiff's motion, and the ruling complained of is the one which limited the last element of the Claim 9 — "means for holding the exhaust valves closed after the press is closed" — to the mechanism described in the specification, that is, mechanism of a type which will lock the exhaust valves at the safety point, in the course of the closing movement of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases