1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 128 F.2d
  5. 128 F.2d 104 (1942)
 

UNITED STATES RUBBER CO. v. GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER CO.

No. 8899.

128 F.2d 104 (1942)

UNITED STATES RUBBER CO. v. GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 7, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. O. Richey, of Cleveland, Ohio (C. T. Neal, of Springfield, Mass., Richey & Watts, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Chapin & Neal, of Springfield, Mass., on the brief), for appellant.

Albert L. Ely, of Cleveland, Ohio (Wm. C. McCoy, Frank S. Greene, and Evans & McCoy, all of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SIMONS, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

This opinion should be read as supplementary to General Tire & Rubber Company v. Fisk Rubber Corporation, 6 Cir., 104 F.2d 740, where claims 1 to 10, inclusive, and claim 14 of Midgley Patent No. 1,742,777 were held valid and infringed.

Some four months after entry in the district court of an interlocutory decree and injunction pursuant to the mandate of this court, the United States Rubber Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases