1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 45 F.Supp.
  5. 45 F.Supp. 158 (1942)
 

CHANDLER v. CUTLER-HAMMER

No. 5325.

45 F.Supp. 158 (1942)

CHANDLER et al. v. CUTLER-HAMMER, Inc.

District Court, E. D. Wisconsin.

April 29, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams, Bradbury & Hinkle, Warren C. Horton and W. M. Kolehmainen, all of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Lecher, Michael, Whyte & Spohn, and Gerrit Foster, all of Milwaukee, Wis., and Thiess, Olson & Mecklenburger, J. Bernhard Thiess, George W. Hansen, and Sidney Neuman, all of Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

DUFFY, District Judge.

The plaintiff Chandler is the owner of the legal title to, and the plaintiff Panish is the exclusive licensee under, Chandler Reissue Patent No. 19,445. The complaint alleges infringement of that patent. The defendant filed its answer, and also a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment asking that Panish Patent No. 1,747,594, owned by the plaintiff Panish, be declared void. Defendant alleges that the plaintiffs had notified the trade, including...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases