1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 48 F.Supp.
  5. 48 F.Supp. 131 (1942)
 

GOTHAM SILK HOSIERY CO. v. ARTCRAFT SILK HOSIERY MILLS

No. 910.

48 F.Supp. 131 (1942)

GOTHAM SILK HOSIERY CO., Inc. v. ARTCRAFT SILK HOSIERY MILLS, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware.

December 11, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City (Edwin D. Steel, Jr., of Wilmington, Del., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Sylvan H. Hirsch and Allen J. Levin, both of Philadelphia, Pa. (Stewart Lynch, of Wilmington, Del., of counsel), for defendant.

FORMAN, District Judge.

This action is brought to recover profits for patent infringement established by Judge Nields of the District Court of Delaware in the case of Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Hosiery Mills, D.C., 1 F.Supp. 643, affirmed 72 F.2d 47, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 595, 55 S.Ct. 109, 79 L.Ed. 688. Plaintiff's patent covers the construction of the top or welt of a lady's silk...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases