1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 47 F.Supp.
  5. 47 F.Supp. 94 (1942)
 

SCHRAM v. SAGE

No. 3317.

47 F.Supp. 94 (1942)

SCHRAM v. SAGE et al.

District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

October 3, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Marx and John A. Hird, both of Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff.

Griffin, Emery & Seely, of Detroit, Mich., for defendant Brandt.

Stanley E. Hathaway, of Detroit, Mich., for defendant Sage.

LEDERLE, District Judge.

Defendant Brandt, seven days after entry of judgment herein, having filed a petition for rehearing, which appears to be a motion to amend findings and conclusions under Rule 52(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, stating that there was no finding nor conclusion as to time of accrual of defendant Sage's cause of action to obtain from plaintiff possession of the involved personalty, defendant Brandt claiming...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases