LORENZ v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE-PEET CO.

No. 7663.

122 F.2d 875 (1941)

LORENZ et al. v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE-PEET CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Rehearing Denied October 30, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Ewing, of New York City, and Harry B. Rook, of Newark, N. J., for appellants.

Frank E. Barrows, of New York City, for appellee.

Before BIGGS, MARIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.


JONES, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs, as the persons interested in Lorenz Patent (No. 2,084,446), one of two interfering patents, brought suit under Section 4918, Revised Statutes, 35 U. S.C.A. § 66, against the defendant as the owner of the other interfering patent (Ittner, No. 1,918,603). The bill of complaint prayed for an adjudication that Lorenz was the first and original inventor of the process set forth in his patent, that his patent is good and valid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases