1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 40 F.Supp.
  5. 40 F.Supp. 928 (1941)
 

BERCOVICI v. CHAPLIN

40 F.Supp. 928 (1941)

BERCOVICI v. CHAPLIN et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

June 24, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davidson & Davidson, of New York City (Louis B. Davidson, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Schwartz & Frohlich, of New York City (Louis D. Frohlich and Herbert P. Jacoby, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Charles S. Chaplin.

COXE, District Judge.

The second and third causes of action are repetitious and fully covered by the allegations of the first cause of action. These two causes of action should, therefore, be stricken. The fourth cause of action merely adds to the first cause of action allegations that the plaintiff's services with respect to "The Great Dictator" were reasonably worth 50% of the net profits of the motion picture. I can see no reason why this cause of action should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases