1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 40 F.Supp.
  5. 40 F.Supp. 891 (1941)
 

EASTMAN KODAK CO. v. COE

Civil Action No. 6078.

40 F.Supp. 891 (1941)

EASTMAN KODAK CO. v. COE, Com'r of Patents.

District Court of United States for the District of Columbia.

June 4, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarence M. Fisher, of Washington, D. C., and N. M. Perrins and Daniel I. Mayne, both of Rochester, N. Y., for plaintiff.

W. W. Cochran, Sol. of Patent Office, and C. W. Moore, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

BAILEY, District Judge.

The chief ground upon which the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office denied the allowance of the claim sought by the plaintiff was that the product claimed was anticipated by an article described in a publication written by König. König gave a general formula for certain dye stuffs as follows:

He also stated that instead of Y a cycloseleno group might occur.

In the plaintiff's product selenium takes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases