RUDOLPH v. EISEN

No. 1127.

38 F.Supp. 868 (1941)

RUDOLPH v. EISEN.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

April 3, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Gallner, of Bridgeton, N. J. (William S. Hodges, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for plaintiff.

E. Francis Wentworth, Jr., of Newark, N. J. (Harry Price, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.


WALKER, District Judge.

The jurisdiction of the federal court over a patent infringement suit against a nonresident defendant depends upon the existence of facts prescribed in Section 109, United States Code Annotated, Title 28. The affidavits of the plaintiff show facts, which if established at the time of trial, give this court jurisdiction. Therefore the motion of the defendant is denied.

The plaintiff must remember that in a suit for patent infringement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases