IN RE EWALD

Patent Appeal No. 4418.

117 F.2d 755 (1941)

In re EWALD.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 24, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cox & Moore, of Chicago, Ill. (Ballard Moore and Curtis F. Prangley, both of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellant.

W. W. Cochran, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


GARRETT, Presiding Judge.

There are involved in this appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office six claims (numbered 14 to 17, inclusive, 19 and 21) embraced in an application for patent for "Improvements in Coring Device." Eighteen claims of the application stand allowed, and are not of concern here.

The invention relates to a device for coring fruit, "specifically," says the brief on behalf of appellant, "to a knife...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases