LEISHMAN v. ASSOCIATED WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO.

No. 1463-BH.

36 F.Supp. 804 (1941)

LEISHMAN v. ASSOCIATED WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

January 31, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Flam, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Lyon & Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Gibson Yungblut, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant.


HARRISON, District Judge.

This is an action for infringement of reissue patent No. 20,827, issued August 16, 1938, upon application dated May 23, 1938. The original patent, under No. 2,108,538, was issued February 15, 1938. Claims 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 only are involved.

The principal defenses are invalidity, lack of infringement and intervening rights.

The Crosley Corporation of Cincinnati, Ohio, the manufacturer of the accused device, has assumed the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases