MITSUI & CO. v. EL DORADO OIL WORKS

No. 21230-S.

38 F.Supp. 752 (1941)

MITSUI & CO., Limited, v. EL DORADO OIL WORKS et al.

District Court, N. D. California, S. D.

March 24, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wright & Wright & Larson, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Alexander D. Diamond, of New York City, in pro. per.

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant and cross-defendant Alexander D. Diamond.

Williamson & Wallace, of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant El Dorado Oil Works.

Dinkelspiel & Dinkelspiel, of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant president and directors of Manhattan Co.


ST. SURE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, having in its possession the sum of $2,860 under an arbitration award, to which there are adverse claimants, filed a bill of interpleader under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 41, subd. 26, and deposited the money here to abide the judgment of the Court.

Claimants to the fund, defendants Alexander D. Diamond, El Dorado Oil Works, and President and Directors of the Manhattan Company, each claiming a lien, submitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases