AKER v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.

No. 2114.

38 F.Supp. 741 (1941)

AKER v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.

District Court, D. Idaho, S. D.

April 17, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie J. Aker, of Boise, Idaho, for plaintiff.

Richards & Haga, of Boise, Idaho, for defendant.


CAVANAH, District Judge.

The defendant moves to dismiss the amended complaint upon similar grounds as those specified, attacking the original complaint and still insists that the amended complaint is objectionable for the reasons:

(a) That it is ambiguous, uncertain and unintelligible.

(b) That several causes of action have been improperly united.

(c) That it is impossible to determine upon what theory plaintiff demands for judgment.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases