MONTGOMERY v. HUTCHINS

No. 9543.

118 F.2d 661 (1941)

MONTGOMERY v. HUTCHINS et al. SAME v. McDANDEL. SAME v. GROOVER.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied April 29, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gray, Cary, Ames & Driscoll, J. G. Driscoll, Jr., and Burton D. Wood, all of San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Forgy, Reinhaus & Forgy, of Santa Ana, Cal., for appellee Groover.

Benjamin Lewis, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee McDandel.

Rorick & Cottingham, of Oceanside, Cal., and Wright, Monroe, Harden & Thomas and Clarence Harden, all of San Diego, Cal., for appellees Hutchins et al.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.


HANEY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal questions the validity of judgments entered in favor of appellees in actions brought by them to recover for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident in which appellant's chauffeur was operating appellant's automobile.

Lynch was employed by appellant as a chauffeur on February 20, 1938, and was instructed that he was not to use appellant's automobile for his personal use, and not to get drunk. On April 10, 1938...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases