GOODWIN v. CARLOSS CO.

No. 8347.

116 F.2d 644 (1941)

GOODWIN v. CARLOSS CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

January 8, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sam D. Rhem, Jr., of Memphis, Tenn. (Chas. L. Neely, Sam D. Rhem, Jr. and James H. Hicks, all of Memphis, Tenn., on the brief), for appellant.

John R. Walker, Jr., of Memphis, Tenn. (John R. Walker, Jr., and R. G. Draper, both of Memphis, Tenn., on the brief), for appellees.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Suit against appellees for infringement of Letters Patent No. 2,048,158, July 21, 1936, to appellant Goodwin for an "Apparatus for Purifying and Cleaning Water." The court concluded that the patent was invalid; and if valid that it was uninfringed.

Claim 1 only is involved.

The apparatus is used primarily in small "local systems" such as for school or farm, where the user has an independent water supply. It is designed for charging...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases