1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 38 F.Supp.
  5. 38 F.Supp. 721 (1941)
 

BAILIS v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION

No. 839.

38 F.Supp. 721 (1941)

BAILIS et al. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

May 9, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Isadore H. Schweidel, and Fred L. Rosenbloom, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Effingham Evarts, of New York City, and Samuel L. Sperling, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Sol. A. Liebman and George Kirk, III, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

KALODNER, District Judge.

The issues having been brought to trial before me without a jury on amended complaint and answer, I make the following

Findings of Fact

1. During the year 1936, the plaintiffs were engaged in the scrap metal business in the City of Philadelphia.

2. The defendant is a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of an Act of Congress of the United States of America, 15 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq., with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases