1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 40 F.Supp.
  5. 40 F.Supp. 706 (1941)
 

IN RE SCHOTT BREWING CO.

No. 9840.

40 F.Supp. 706 (1941)

In re SCHOTT BREWING CO. UNITED STATES for use of AURELIUS v. EBERHARDT et al.

District Court, S. D. Illinois, S. D.

July 24, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard L. Doyle, U. S. Atty., and Marks Alexander, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Springfield, Ill., Harold G. Baker, Leigh M. Kagy, and Baker, Lesemann, Kagy & Wagner, all of East St. Louis, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Louis F. Gillespie, Edmund Burke, and Gillespie, Burke & Gillespie, all of Springfield, Ill., and Henry B. Eaton, of Edwardsville, Ill., for defendants.

ADAIR, District Judge.

This cause again coming on to be heard on this 24th day of July, A. D. 1941, upon the complaint, the answers of the defendants Henry W. Eberhardt and George A. Lochmann and the separate answer of defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, upon the evidence both oral and documentary taken and received in open court and upon the evidence both oral and documentary offered, received and admitted in evidence by virtue of the stipulation entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases