NATIONAL HAIRDRESSERS' & C. ASS'N v. PHILAD CO.

Civ. A. No. 155.

41 F.Supp. 701 (1941)

NATIONAL HAIRDRESSERS' & COSMETOLOGISTS' ASS'N, Inc., et al. v. PHILAD CO.

District Court, D. Delaware.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing November 15, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George B. Finnegan, Jr. (of Morgan, Finnegan & Durham), of New York City, and E. Ennalls Berl (of Southerland, Berl, Potter & Leahy), of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiffs.

Arthur J. Hudson (of Kwis, Hudson & Kent), of Cleveland, Ohio, and Herbert L. Cohen, of Wilmington, Del., for defendant.


BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The amended complaint at bar asserts two causes of action. The plaintiffs, the National Hairdressers' and Cosmetologists' Association, Inc., and Fred The Hair Stylist, Inc., seek a declaratory judgment adjudging Josef Mayer's1 Reissue Patent No. 18,841 to be invalid and a declaration that this patent is not infringed by Fred or the members of National.2 Fred and National seek also to enjoin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases