IN RE GEISLER

Patent Appeal No. 4503.

121 F.2d 537 (1941)

In re GEISLER et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

July 2, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. D. Phinney, of New York City (R. P. Morris and Paul Kolisch, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

W. W. Cochran, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


BLAND, Judge.

Claims 8 and 13 of appellants' application for a patent relating to a light-sensitive device were allowed by the Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office, while claims 1 to 7, inclusive, 9, 11 and 14 were rejected. The decision of the examiner rejecting said claims was affirmed by the Board of Appeals, and appellants have appealed here from the board's decision.

Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims at bar and follows:

"1....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases