PER CURIAM.
There is nothing of any consequence in this appeal except the sufficiency of the evidence. The defendant Green asks us to hold that his activities were only those of an informer, and that the evidence permitted no other conclusion than that, when he took money from the bootleggers, he was only cheating them, and had no purpose to obstruct their prosecution. It is not altogether clear just what the defendant Freidel does assert, unless it be that the jury...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
