UNITED STATES
v.
B. F. GOODRICH CO. et al.
MANDEL
v.
COOPER CORPORATION et al.
UNITED STATES ex rel. STIM
v.
SAME.
District Court, S. D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 9, 1941.
October 9, 1941.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Edward A. Scott, Jr., of New York City (Abraham L. Pomerantz, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in civil action.
Fertig, Walter & Gottesman, of New York City (Alfred A. Walter, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff, Martin E. Mandel, etc.
Kenefick, Cooke, Mitchell, Bass & Letchworth, and Lyman M. Bass, all of Buffalo, N. Y., and Wright, Gordon, Zachry, Parlin & Cahill, of New York City, for defendant Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.
Sullivan & Cromwell, of New York City, for defendant General Tire & Rubber Co.
Howard L. Hyde, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Wright, Gordon, Zachry, Parlin & Cahill, of New York City, for defendant Good-year Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.
Spence, Windels, Walser, Hotchkiss & Angell, of New York City, for defendant Lee Tire & Rubber Co. of N. Y., Inc.
Slabaugh, Seiberling, Huber & Guinther, of Akron, Ohio, and Milton Dammann, of New York City, for defendant Mohawk Rubber Co. of N. Y., Inc.
Jeffery, Escher & Murray, of New York City, for defendant Pennsylvania Rubber Co.
Arthur, Dry & Dole, of New York City, for defendants United States Rubber Products, Inc., and U. S. Tire Dealers Corporation.
Pickrel, Schaeffer & Ebeling, of Dayton, Ohio, and Maurice P. Davidson, of New York City, for defendant Dayton Rubber Mfg. Co.
Luther Day, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Davidson, Moses & Sicher, of New York City, for defendant Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Charles Wesley Dunn, of New York City, and Frank C. Leslie, of Akron Ohio (John T. Cahill, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant, B. F. Goodrich Co.
District Court, S. D. New York.
BRIGHT, District Judge.
This action was commenced on June 25, 1941 by the United States of America by Edward A. Scott, Jr., suing for the benefit of himself and the United States, and against the above-named defendants, who ask for a stay until further order of the court because of the pendency of a similar action brought on April 3, 1941, by the same plaintiff by Martin E. Mandel. Plaintiff opposes the stay and asks that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
