SWEENEY, District Judge.
In this action the plaintiff seeks an accounting of the defendants' profits growing out of an alleged infringement of the plaintiff's patent No. 1,924,963, and an injunction against further infringement of it. The defendants assert that the patent is void for want of invention, but that, if valid, its claims are so limited by the prior art that the defendants' device does not infringe it. The claims in suit are claims 3 and 4. Claims 2 and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.