1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 37 F.Supp.
  5. 37 F.Supp. 538 (1941)
 

WHY CORPORATION v. SUPER IRONER CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 75.

37 F.Supp. 538 (1941)

WHY CORPORATION v. SUPER IRONER CORPORATION.

District Court, W. D. Michigan, S. D.

February 20, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Woodhams, of Kalamazoo, Mich., and Church & Church and Clarence B. Des Jardins, all of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

William Cyrus Rice, of Grand Rapids, Mich., and Wilkinson, Huxley, Byron & Knight and Eugene M. Giles, all of Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

RAYMOND, District Judge.

1. The plaintiff, Why Corporation, is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of California and has a place of business at Los Angeles, California.

2. The defendant, Super Ironer Corporation, is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Michigan and has its place of business at St. Joseph, Michigan.

3. The validity of the patent in suit and the manufacture and sale of ironing machines embodying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases