TEPLITZKY v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

No. 2169.

38 F.Supp. 535 (1941)

TEPLITZKY v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

February 13, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. J. Wayne, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

E. M. Burke, Clement L. Harrell, and Loesch, Scofield, Loesch & Burke, all of Chicago, Ill., for defendant.


HOLLY, District Judge.

Defendant as a first defense has alleged that the complaint fails to state a claim against defendant. In their brief on plaintiff's motion to strike this defense counsel for defendant state as a basis for the motion that the plaintiff charges defendant with having violated certain statutes of the State of Ohio and ordinances of the City of Lima in that state, but has failed to set forth the statute and the ordinance. Failure to observe the provisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases