1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 119 F.2d
  5. 119 F.2d 451 (1941)
 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. MURPHY

No. 7780.

119 F.2d 451 (1941)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. MURPHY.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

March 24, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richmond B. Keech, Corp. Counsel, Vernon E. West, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Glenn Simmon, Asst. Corp. Counsel, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Harry R. Turkel, of Washington, D. C., and Henry C. Murphy, pro se, for respondent.

Phineas Indritz, amicus curiae.

Before STEPHENS, MILLER and VINSON, Associate Justices.

MILLER, Associate Justice.

This is a companion case to District of Columbia v. DeHart, ___ App.D.C. ___, 119 F.2d 449, decided this day. The applicable statute is the same;1 the same issue of law is presented, and, in our view, the case is controlled by the reasoning of the decision of this court in Sweeney v. District of Columbia.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases