BOURQUIN v. GRANDINETTI


43 F.Supp. 523 (1941)

BOURQUIN et al. v. GRANDINETTI et al.

District Court, N. D. New York.

December 31, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin & Rendell, of Utica, N. Y. (Basel H. Brune and Joshua R. H. Potts, both of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Charles Fiandaca, of Rochester, N. Y., for defendants.


BRYANT, District Judge.

This is a suit for declaratory judgment. Defendants counterclaim for decree of infringement and damages for unfair competition.

Both parties, among other things, manufacture and sell a combined fruit and vegetable expresser and container. The case arises because of the issue to D. A. Grandinetti, on April 20, 1937, of a design patent, being patent numbered 104,138.

Plaintiffs claim that the patent is invalid. They further contend...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases