1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 36 F.Supp.
  5. 36 F.Supp. 486 (1941)
 

STEINGUT v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK

No. 1607.

36 F.Supp. 486 (1941)

STEINGUT et al. v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK.

District Court, E. D. New York.

January 10, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Natanson, Pack & Scholer, of New York City (Joseph Day Lee, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Shearman & Sterling and McClellan & Shrewsbury, all of New York City (MacIlburne Voorhies, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion "for an order remanding this cause to said Supreme Court".

Although the plaintiffs had due notice of defendant's objection to the form of the notice of motion, nothing has been done by them to correct it. The notice of motion does not comply with Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c.

Under Rule 7, Subdivision (b) 1, of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases