1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 36 F.Supp.
  5. 36 F.Supp. 486 (1941)
 

UNITED STATES v. GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE COMPANY

Civil Action 183.

36 F.Supp. 486 (1941)

UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE COMPANY, Defendant.

District Court, D. Delaware.

January 10, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thurman Arnold, Asst. Atty. Gen., Mac Asbill and W. B. Watson Snyder, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., H. Douglas Weaver, Sp. Atty., of Washington, D. C., and Stewart Lynch, U. S. Atty., of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Dan Moody, of Austin, Tex., James J. Cosgrove, of Ponca City, Okl., and Clarence A. Southerland (of Southerland, Berl, Potter & Leahy), of Wilmington, Del., for defendant.

Before BIGGS, CLARK, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The questions raised by the motion to dismiss the petition in the case at bar are disposed of by our opinion filed this day in the case of United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Phillips Petroleum Company and Phillips Pipe Line Company, Defendants, 36 F.Supp. 480.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases