IN RE VIDOR


46 F.Supp. 468 (1941)

In re VIDOR.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 2, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann, of New York City, for William H. Vidor.

Franklin S. Wood, of New York City, for petitioner Bagarozy.

Louis S. Adler, of New York City, for petitioner Rubinsky.


KNOX, District Judge.

It is my opinion that the application herein for dismissal of the petition and discharge of the receiver should be granted.

The alleged bankrupt has challenged this proceeding from the outset. Two petitions previously have been dismissed because defective. A motion was made to dismiss the instant proceeding and that was denied by Judge Conger. An application was made for reargument which was referred to Judge Conger, but the papers never...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases