BEE MACH. CO. v. FREEMAN

No. 1224.

41 F.Supp. 461 (1941)

BEE MACH. CO., Inc., v. FREEMAN.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

October 6, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Sullivan, of Lynn, Mass., Walter Powers, of Sherburne, Power & Needham, Dike, Calver & Porter, and Cedric W. Porter, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Allen & Allen and Marston Allen, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Nathan Heard and Frederick A. Tennant, both of Boston, Mass., for defendant.


BREWSTER, District Judge.

In this action defendant has moved for a summary judgment under Rule 56 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The motion is based on the doctrine of res adjudicata, the defendant contending that all genuine issues of facts raised by the pleadings have already been adjudicated in a suit in equity, brought by this plaintiff against this defendant and another, in the Federal Court in the Southern District of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases