1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 37 F.Supp.
  5. 37 F.Supp. 459 (1941)
 

UNITED STATES v. UNIVIS LENS CO.

37 F.Supp. 459 (1941)

UNITED STATES v. UNIVIS LENS CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 3, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel S. Isseks, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., Stanley E. Disney and Marcus A. Hollabaugh, both of Washington, D. C., Special Attorneys, for plaintiff.

Frederick S. Duncan, of New York City, and Toulmin & Toulmin, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

COXE, District Judge.

It is clear from the affidavits submitted on this motion that the corporate defendants are "transacting business" in the Southern District; that is all that is required to sustain the venue here under Section 12 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. 22. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Co., 273 U.S. 359, 47 S.Ct. 400, 71 L.Ed. 684; Hansen Packing Company v. Armour & Co., D.C., 16 F.Supp. 784...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases