1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 41 F.Supp.
  5. 41 F.Supp. 449 (1941)
 

PFANSTIEHL CHEMICAL CO. v. AMERICAN PLATINUM WORKS

No. 5892.

41 F.Supp. 449 (1941)

PFANSTIEHL CHEMICAL CO. v. AMERICAN PLATINUM WORKS et al.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

September 16, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George D. Richards, of Newark, N. J., and Chritton, Wiles, Davies, Hirschl & Dawson, of Chicago, Ill. (Charles J. Merriam, Bernard A. Schroeder, and Russell Wiles, all of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Lum, Tamblyn & Fairlie, of Newark, N. J. (Ralph E. Lum, of Newark, N. J., of counsel), for defendant American Platinum Works.

Frederick P. Randolph, of New York City (Theodore S. Kenyon and Douglas H. Kenyon, both of New York City, of counsel), for Hecking and O'Brien.

FAKE, District Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding in which the plaintiff attacks the validity of the defendants' patent, Hecking No. 1,909,616, relating to improvements in pens, pen points and the process of making them. It was applied for in 1927 and issued in 1933.

The claims of the patent in suit relating to the process involved indicate the fusing of a shot-like body having an operative writing surface, the annexation or securing of it to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases