CHESAPEAKE & O. RY. CO. v. HOEY


39 F.Supp. 419 (1941)

CHESAPEAKE & O. RY. CO. v. HOEY, Collector of Internal Revenue.

District Court, S. D. New York.

April 1, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

White & Case, of New York City, and J. C. Kauffman, of Cleveland, Ohio (Russell D. Morrill, of New York City, and John B. Marshall, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff.

John T. Cahill, U. S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, of New York City (William L. Lynch, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.


MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

This is a tax refund suit. The plaintiff and the defendant have made cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings.

The sole issue is whether the "Amending Agreement" of February 1, 1936 is a new "agreement to sell" and thus a new taxable event within the meaning and intent of Section 800, Schedule A-3 of Title VIII of the Revenue Act of 1926, as amended.

The plaintiff duly filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases