1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 314 U.S.
  5. 314 U.S. 94 (1941)
 

AUTOMATIC DEVICES CORP. v. SINKO TOOL & MANUFACTURING CO.

No. 6.

314 U.S. 94 (1941)

AUTOMATIC DEVICES CORP. v. SINKO TOOL & MANUFACTURING CO.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 10, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Drury W. Cooper, with whom Messrs. Henry M. Huxley and Thomas J. Byrne were on the brief, for petitioner.

Messrs. Russell Wiles and Bernard A. Schroeder, with whom Mr. George A. Chritton was on the brief, for respondent.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a companion case to Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp., ante, p. 84. The court below held that claims 2, 3, and 11 of the Mead patent (No. 1,736,544) were invalid and not infringed. 112 F.2d 335. We granted the petition for certiorari limited to the question of validity of those claims. For the reasons stated in Cuno Engineering Corp.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases