1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 121 F.2d
  5. 121 F.2d 273 (1941)
 

WILLIAMS MFG. CO. v. UNITED SHOE MACH. CORPORATION

No. 8438.

121 F.2d 273 (1941)

WILLIAMS MFG. CO. v. UNITED SHOE MACH. CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 27, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. A. Toulmin, Jr., of Dayton, Ohio (Dolle, O'Donnell & Cash, of Cincinnati, Ohio, Toulmin & Toulmin, of Dayton, Ohio, James B. O'Donnell, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and H. A. Toulmin, H. A. Toulmin, Jr., and Rowan A. Greer, all of Dayton, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Harrison F. Lyman, of Boston, Mass. (Harrison F. Lyman, Charles E. Hammett, Jr., and Fish, Richardson & Neave, all of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for appellee.

Before SIMONS, HAMILTON, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

Certain of the claims of two patents in the shoe-making art were held below to be valid and infringed by a number of machines purchased abroad by the appellant and used by it in the United States. The appellant assails the decree in respect both to its adjudication of validity and infringement.

The patents in suit are McFeely, No. 1,558,737, for a lasting machine, granted October 27, 1925, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases