1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 118 F.2d
  5. 118 F.2d 242 (1941)
 

GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY v. THOMPSON

Nos. 2159, 2160, 2179, 2180, 2183, 2186, 2187, 2189, 2190.

118 F.2d 242 (1941)

GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY v. THOMPSON et al. and eight other cases.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 3, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jesse L. Ballard, of Vinita, Okl. (R. L. Davidson, of Tulsa, Okl., Q. B. Boydstun, of Vinita, Okl., and Gayle M. Pickens, of Miami, Okl., on the brief), for appellant.

Frank Nesbitt, of Miami, Okl. (Nelle Nesbitt, of Miami, Okl., L. Keith Smith, of Jay, Okl., J. J. Smith and Henry Walker, both of Miami, Okl., R. L. Wheatley, of Vinita, Okl., and Ad V. Coppedge, of Grove, Okl., on the brief), for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, MURRAH, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, Grand River Dam Authority, is a public corporation agency and instrumentality of the State of Oklahoma, created by an Act of the Oklahoma Legislature approved April 26, 1935, Okl.Session Laws, 1935, Chapter 70, Art. 4, Sec. 1, 82 Okl.St.Ann. § 861, in which it is authorized and empowered, among other things, to control, store and preserve the waters of Grand River and its tributaries for any useful purpose and to develop...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases