RICHARD NATHAN CORP. v. MITSUBISHI SHOJI KAISHA, LIM.


41 F.Supp. 299 (1941)

RICHARD NATHAN CORPORATION v. MITSUBISHI SHOJI KAISHA, LIMITED, et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 10, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emil H. Wasserberger, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Hunt, Hill & Betts, of New York City (William Logan, Jr., of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd.

Putney, Twombly & Hall, of New York City (Lemuel Skidmore, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Mitsui & Co., Ltd.


HULBERT, District Judge.

The defendants have filed companion motions to vacate attachments allowed herein, or in the alternative, to reduce the amounts attached, and also to increase the amount of the plaintiff's security. Both defendants pray further in the alternative that the attachments be vacated upon the filing of a joint and several bond.

Defendant Mitsui has also moved for leave to file an amended answer herein.

The first and second causes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases