1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 41 F.Supp.
  5. 41 F.Supp. 258 (1941)
 

UNITED STATES v. UNIVIS LENS CO.

41 F.Supp. 258 (1941)

UNITED STATES v. UNIVIS LENS CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

September 17, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., of United States, and Stanley E. Disney, Irving B. Glickfeld, John E. McCracken, George L. Derr, and Samuel S. Isseks, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Sp. Attys., for plaintiff.

Frederick S. Duncan, of New York City, and Toulmin & Toulmin, of Dayton, Ohio (Frederick S. Duncan, of New York City, and H. A. Toulmin, H. A. Toulmin, Jr., and Rowan A. Greer, all of Dayton, Ohio, of counsel), for defendants.

GALSTON, District Judge.

The complaint charges violations of Secs. 1 and 3 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 3, and alleges that the Univis Lens Co., Inc. (which will hereafter be referred to as the Lens Company), manufactures bifocal lenses pursuant to an unlawful combination and conspiracy in which the Univis Corporation is accused of having unlawfully set up a system of price control through...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases