1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 40 F.Supp.
  5. 40 F.Supp. 203 (1941)
 

BAKER v. STERLING ENGRAVING CO.

Civ. A. No. 879.

40 F.Supp. 203 (1941)

BAKER v. STERLING ENGRAVING CO.

District Court, D. Maryland.

July 18, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morton P. Fisher, of Baltimore, Md., and Harold F. Watson, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Herman Shapiro, of Baltimore, Md., and Henry H. Snelling (of Snelling & Hendricks), of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

CHESNUT, District Judge.

Claims 4 and 5 of the patent in this suit (U. S. No. 2,207,449-Baker) are, I think, clearly invalid for want of novelty and invention. Claim 5 is the one particularly relied upon in this case by the plaintiff. It reads as follows: "5. Carriage stepping mechanism for the purpose described, including in combination, a bed, guide means thereon, a carriage adapted for movement along said guide means, means providing a plurality of accurately and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases