1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 119 F.2d
  5. 119 F.2d 1022 (1941)
 

ARRINGTON v. ROBERTSON

No. 7655.

119 F.2d 1022 (1941)

Seeta ARRINGTON and William Roy Arrington, Plaintiffs, v. Clinton K. ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

May 29, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Comber, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa. (William H. James, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Louis S. Hankin, of Philadelphia, Pa. (B. Nathaniel Richter, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before BIGGS, CLARK, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appeal in this litigation to this court. See Arrington v. Robertson, 3 Cir., 1940, 114 F.2d 821. We have examined the testimony herein fully and conclude that no substantial question is involved in this appeal and that we should not be justified in filling the space involved in printing the demonstration of that fact.

The judgment of the District Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases