1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 117 F.2d
  5. 117 F.2d 1017 (1941)
 

IN RE ADAMS

Patent Appeals No. 4435.

117 F.2d 1017 (1941)

In re ADAMS.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 24, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio (Watts T. Estabrook, of Washington, D. C., and James T. Hoffmann, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for appellant.

W. W. Cochran, of Washington, D.C., (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting claims 56, 57, and 58 of appellant's application for a patent upon the ground that said claims are not supported by the disclosure of the application. It does not appear that any claims have been allowed.

Claims 56 and 58 are illustrative of the subject matter involved and read as follows:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases