1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 39 F.Supp.
  5. 39 F.Supp. 985 (1941)
 

GREEN v. LUDFORD FRUIT PRODUCTS

No. 1023.

39 F.Supp. 985 (1941)

GREEN et al. v. LUDFORD FRUIT PRODUCTS, Inc.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

July 18, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brezina & Buckingham, of Chicago, Ill., and Joseph F. Westall, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Rupert B. Turnbull, of Los Angeles, Cal. for defendant.

J. F. T. O'CONNOR, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, R. H. Green, A. M. Green, and J. B. Green, doing business as Green & Green, a copartnership, but formerly a corporation, are engaged in the business of marketing concentrates, extracts, and beverages for nonalcoholic carbonated soft drinks. Their principal place of business is Houston, Texas and their principal product is a soft drink known as "Fruit Bowl", an opaque, reddish carbonated mixture of fruit concentrate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases