CHASE v. COE

No. 4712.

31 F.Supp. 935 (1940)

CHASE et al. v. COE, Com'r of Patents.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

March 8, 1940.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George M. Anderson, of Washington, D. C. (George F. Scull, of New York City, and Stuart Hilder, of Orange, N. J., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

William Wallace Cochran, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.


LETTS, Justice.

Upon the record there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. It is agreed or stands without dispute; that plaintiffs' application in suit was previously in an interference proceeding No. 69,901, in the Patent Office, with an application of Harold T. Avery, that said interference was declared on December 26, 1934, that claims numbered 2, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 22, and 23, which are as set out in paragraph 7 of the complaint, constituted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases