JACOBS v. HERLANDS


51 Misc.2d 907 (1940)

Ralph K. Jacobs, Plaintiff, v. William B. Herlands, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

January 3, 1940


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert Blumenstiel for plaintiff. William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel, for defendant.


FRANCIS G. HOOLEY, J.

Motion under subdivision 6 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order striking out the first, second, fourth and sixth separate and complete defenses contained in a second amended answer upon the ground that the same are insufficient as a matter of law. The complaint alleges libel.

The first separate defense is insufficient in law. The defense is absolute privilege...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases