1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 36 F.Supp.
  5. 36 F.Supp. 51 (1940)
 

PARRIS-DUNN CORPORATION v. FALES

No. 59.

36 F.Supp. 51 (1940)

PARRIS-DUNN CORPORATION v. FALES.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

December 14, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bair & Freeman, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Chritton, Wiles, Davies, Hirschl & Dawson, of Chicago, Ill., and Greer Marechal, of Marechal & Noe, of Dayton, Ohio, for defendant.

NEVIN, District Judge.

On January 12, 1940, plaintiff filed its complaint in this court under the Declaratory Judgment Statute asking that Stuart Patent No. 1,802,094, dated April 21, 1931 (for a Turbine), be held invalid. Plaintiff prays "for Judgment that the Stuart patent No. 1,802,094 is invalid, and providing for a permanent injunction restraining defendant from threatening plaintiff or its customers with suits or claims of infringement

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases