1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 32 F.Supp.
  5. 32 F.Supp. 836 (1940)
 

UNITED STATES v. STANDARD SURETY & CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK

32 F.Supp. 836 (1940)

UNITED STATES, to Use and Benefit of NEW YORK CASUALTY CO. v. STANDARD SURETY & CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 21, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Love & Horwitz, of New York City, for use-plaintiff.

Hobart R. Marvin, of New York City, for defendant Standard Surety.

HULBERT, District Judge.

In U. S. for Use of Sloan v. Rego Building Corp. et al.1 (affirmed on appeal, without opinion, 2 Cir., 87 F.2d 1021) my colleague Judge Coxe said: "I think it is too plain for argument that insurance premiums on workmen's compensation and employer's liability policies are not within the protection of the Heard Act. [Hurd Act], 40 U.S.C.A. § 270. These premiums are not `labor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases