LENROOT, Associate Judge.
This appeal brings before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, for lack of patentability in view of the cited prior art, claims 2, 3, 4, 13 and 14 of appellant's application for a patent. No claims were allowed. Claims 2, 3 and 4 are for a process, and claims 13 and 14 are method claims.
Claims 2, 3, and 14 are illustrative and read as follows...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.