1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 32 F.Supp.
  5. 32 F.Supp. 690 (1940)
 

B. B. CHEMICAL CO. v. ELLIS

No. 4642.

32 F.Supp. 690 (1940)

B. B. CHEMICAL CO. v. ELLIS et al.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

April 24, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. D. Salinger, Fish, Richardson & Neave, and C. E. Hammett, Jr., all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

William Gates, Jr., and Roberts, Cushman & Woodberry, all of Boston, Mass., for defendants.

James R. Hodder, of Boston, Mass., for defendants Elmer A. Ellis, and Magic Tape Co.

BREWSTER, District Judge.

This is an infringement suit, presenting only two issues, (1) the issue of infringement, and (2) the issue whether, as a result of plaintiff's manner of conducting its business, it and its licensees have, in fact, secured a virtual monopoly in the manufacture and sale of unpatented materials. The word "defendant", as herein used, means the corporate defendant Magic Tape Corporation unless otherwise indicated.

Statement of Facts....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases