1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 31 F.Supp.
  5. 31 F.Supp. 689 (1940)
 

SCHARF v. WEINFELD & KAHN

31 F.Supp. 689 (1940)

SCHARF v. WEINFELD & KAHN, Inc. SAME v. UMBRELLA TIP-ON CORPORATION. SAME v. WEINFELD & KAHN, Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 23, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blair, Curtis, Dunne & Hayward, of New York City (Daniel L. Morris, John C. Blair, and James L. Black, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Kamerman & Witkin, of New York City (J. T. Basseches and J. I. Weinfeld, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

For the reasons, hereinafter outlined, my judgment in these three causes is —

1. (a) That I hold valid but not infringed Claims Nos. 1, 2, 15, 16, 17 and 18 of United States Patent No. 1,719,785, for a "Sewing Machine".

(b) That I hold valid and infringed Claim No. 42 of United States Patent No. 1,727,908, for a "Sewing Machine".

(c) That I hold valid and infringed Claims Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of United States...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases