1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 32 F.Supp.
  5. 32 F.Supp. 665 (1940)
 

STATE FARM MUT. AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. HUGEE

No. 219.

32 F.Supp. 665 (1940)

STATE FARM MUT. AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. HUGEE et al.

District Court, E. D. South Carolina, Florence Division.

April 15, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Royall & Wright, of Florence, S. C., and Samuel Want, of Darlington, S. C. (Robert Moseley, of Greensboro, N. C., and McEachin & Townsend, of Florence, S. C., of counsel), for plaintiff.

W. Stokes Houck and W. Marshall Bridges, both of Florence, S. C., Mozingo & Bryan, of Darlington, S. C., Wm. H. Smith, of Florence, S. C., and John D. Nock, of Cheraw, S. C., for defendants.

LUMPKIN, District Judge.

State Farm Mutual Insurance Company seeks herein an adjudication under the Federal Declaratory judgment Act, 28 U. S.C.A. § 400, against Patton's, Inc., and twelve injured bus passengers of its liability under its policy covering Patton's laundry truck, operated by Patton's driver McRae, while allegedly about business of his own at the time of a collision with a Greensboro-Fayetteville or Queen City bus driven by Stone, in which McRae...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases